bethope.pages.dev

Animated Series Featuring Homosexual Themes

Animated Characters Portraying Homosexuality

Nathan_Smith (Nathan Smith) First Post

This particular item came to my attention.

insider.com

A pioneering, searchable database has been compiled, encompassing 259 LGBTQ+ characters found within...

Within the realm of children's animation, television programs like ‘Steven Universe,' ‘She-Ra and the Princesses of Power,' and ‘Craig of the Creek' are pioneering efforts by featuring the highest number of LGBTQ+ personages.

This purports to be a comprehensive inventory of animated personages identified as 'gay.' (For brevity's sake, I employ the term 'gay' as an abbreviated reference to LGBTQ+, as acronyms are rather irksome to me.) Several of these individuals portrayed are quite ancillary, and in certain animated series I've viewed, I possessed no inkling of the character's homosexual orientation. Nevertheless, it could serve as a reasonably useful directory. My ability to navigate the compilation permitted me to identify programs that my children have viewed, discerning both the specific characters present and their relative significance within the narratives.

However, contemplating the current state of our society, one might contend that, moving forward, nearly any production released after the year 2020 will likely be considered deeply questionable, unless it explicitly adheres to Christian tenets.

Two Endorsements

FaithAlone (John M.) Second Post

Nathan_Smith:

A number of these personages are quite insignificant, and regarding several of these animated features I have viewed, I had no inkling whatsoever that the individual was homosexual.

My gratitude for sharing this information.

I find myself indebted to Jerry Falwell for a substantial apology, given my previous amusement concerning his assertions about 'Tinky Winky's' purported homosexuality; it appears he was indeed correct, and my earlier stance was mistaken.

It is evident that these individuals exhibit a profound interest in our progeny.

Three Endorsements

bencarmack (Ben Carmack) Third Contribution

I investigated an animated program that piqued my interest, discovering an absence of homosexual characters; however, I observed that ‘Clifford the Big Red Dog' featured such personages.

I am uncertain whether my offspring would be extensively indoctrinated by overtly homosexual characters. In my estimation, the subtle promotion of effeminacy within contemporary children's programming poses a significantly larger peril. This hazard, moreover, extends to myself, concerning the entertainment I choose to consume.

An entertainment program possesses the capacity to impart effeminate traits even without presenting any homosexual characters, or indeed, without any mention of homosexuality or the 'Pride' movement whatsoever.

Three Endorsements

jtbayly (Joseph Bayly) Fourth Post

Perhaps, Christian programming ought to incorporate a homosexual character or two, thereby imparting a sense of shame.

Six Endorsements

bencarmack (Ben Carmack) Fifth Contribution

Your observation prompts me to reflect upon the vintage Looney Toons episodes I occasionally view alongside my children. These are accessible without charge via YouTube. The origins of these animated shorts date back to the period of the Second World War. My thoughts turn to how these depicted masculinity and femininity, and whether they ever instilled a sense of disgrace regarding homosexuality. Although I am inclined to affirm their doing so, a concrete instance does not readily surface in my memory.

It is rather noteworthy how profoundly Jewish individuals were implicated in the production of those classic animated features.

Two Endorsements

jtbayly (Joseph Bayly) Sixth Contribution

bencarmack:

It is rather noteworthy how profoundly Jewish individuals were implicated in the production of those classic animated features.

Are you once more perusing the works of E. Michael Jones?

Three Endorsements

bencarmack (Ben Carmack) 7

jacobgonzales (Jacob Gonzales) Eighth Contribution

Although the escalating promotion of homosexual characters within animation is apparent, it is equally crucial to acknowledge the considerable quantity of 'unidentified' personages that the referenced article failed to recognize. This fact was particularly striking to me, considering the article explicitly states that numerous characters were 'confirmed' as gay only many years subsequent to their respective shows' initial broadcasts.

It is remarkable how adept practitioners of sodomy are at revising historical narratives. An individual perusing their written works will discern their propensity for injecting homoerotic interpretations into historical occurrences, personalities, political movements, and cultural aspects, even when historical records offer no indication whatsoever of homosexuality pertaining to those subjects. They assert that past men and women were LGBTQ+ or present cultural and artistic creations as instances of historical gay expression. Proponents of queer theory maintain that by normalizing homosexuality within historical contexts, they can subsequently normalize it for both the current era and forthcoming times. Their aspiration is for people to perceive homosexuality omnipresently, extending even to elements as seemingly innocuous as vintage animated figures. If, hypothetically, civilized society was indeed constructed by unseen gay men and lesbians, what justifiable basis do we possess for publicly ostracizing them in the contemporary age?

Similarly, 'Revoicers' and purportedly celibate homosexual 'Christians' employ these very deceptive stratagems in their attempts to normalize both homosexuality and effeminacy within the ecclesiastical sphere. Whether through the distortion of Jonathan and David's pious and affectionate bond, or by casting aspersions upon celibate church fathers, their objective remains the same: to portray virtuous heroes and saints as equally depraved as themselves. Just as a thief presumes all others steal, so too do homosexual individuals aspire for everyone to be revealed from a metaphorical closet that, in reality, has no existence.

Thirteen Endorsements

John (John Trocke) Ninth Contribution

bencarmack:

It is rather noteworthy how profoundly Jewish individuals were implicated in the production of those classic animated features.

In my estimation, you have precisely discerned the crux of the matter in this instance.

jtbayly (Joseph Bayly) Tenth Post

Even without having reviewed the compilation, I was convinced that instances of revisionist practices would be discernible within it.

However, your elucidation regarding the profound significance of this issue is exceedingly beneficial; therefore, I extend my gratitude!

Two Endorsements

mattrob (Matt Robison) Eleventh Contribution

I would contend that this trend commenced no later than 2016.

Its nature is remarkably clear.

My standard response has, at present, become an emphatic 'No.' Should a program also pique my interest as suitable for joint viewing with my children, I will undertake a prior screening of its content. To date, my decision has consistently remained negative.

Consequently, a return to the animated series featuring Batman and Superman from the 1990s seems appropriate.

Two Endorsements

hhtuck (Jay Tuck) Twelfth Post

I recently listened to an impassioned discourse asserting that the animated cartoon medium experienced a resurgence, which was abruptly curtailed in the mid-2010s subsequent to a high-ranking Cartoon Network executive (whom I suspect was homosexual himself) being dismissed for offering a tepid defense of a cartoonist implicated in a 'Me Too' allegation. Presently, it appears a heavy-handed agenda is undeniably in play.

tesseract (Tyler) Thirteenth Contribution

jacobgonzales:

the substantial quantity of unidentified personages

For this reason, I harbored a consistent disliking for the ‘Despicable Me' film series; those peculiar yellow entities invariably unnerved me.

One Endorsement

tesseract (Tyler) Fourteenth Post

The nineteen-nineties? Are you, perchance, affiliated with a liberal ideology?

One Endorsement

FaithAlone (John M.) Fifteenth Contribution

Nathan_Smith:

This particular item came to my attention.

I am grateful for your sharing of this information. It came to my knowledge that an animated program, which my offspring were observing on Netflix, presented a principal character of homosexual orientation. Though I believe they had not progressed sufficiently into the series for this to become overtly apparent, I nonetheless found myself unable to shake the conviction that by granting my children entry to Netflix's 'Kids' segment, I was, in essence, inviting them to engage with vipers.

Consequently, I terminated my Netflix subscription. While I am powerless to halt the surrender of my nation and its cultural fabric to ignoble impulses, I am certainly capable of ceasing financial contributions that serve to introduce such influences into my domicile.

It is my earnest hope that this occurrence will catalyze beneficial conversations with my elder offspring regarding the imperative of living righteously, distinctly set apart from this depraved generation. My current conclusion is to ensure that my children fully grasp that individuals residing beyond their protective sphere of family, church, and homeschooling are not 'their people' in any profound respect; they do not espouse our values, share our culture, nor do they possess any genuine concern for my children's welfare.

Seven Endorsements

FaithAlone (John M.) Sixteenth Contribution

bencarmack:

It is rather noteworthy how profoundly Jewish individuals were implicated in the production of those classic animated features.

'So many Jews are in show biz
Tom Cruise isn't, but I heard his agent is.'
-Adam Sandler

Six Endorsements

tesseract (Tyler) Seventeenth Post

I have observed a recent surge in anti-Jewish sentiment across online platforms, a development that has caused me considerable disquiet; I confess I never anticipated encountering such views within this forum.

Nathan_Smith (Nathan Smith) Eighteenth Contribution

I am, in point of fact, attempting to comprehend the asserted connection to Jewish individuals and the pertinence of such a link.

jtbayly (Joseph Bayly) Nineteenth Post

E. Michael Jones is unequivocally an anti-Semite, a fact which represents a significant issue warranting caution. This, therefore, was the impetus for my remark to Ben. Nevertheless, Jones's assertions hold true in the majority of his writings, encompassing, for instance, the detrimental influence exerted by numerous Jewish individuals upon this nation, notably through their advancement of atheism within the entertainment sphere.

Six Endorsements

Krlamb1 (Ken Lamb) Twentieth Contribution

In my estimation, a certain 'queerness' pervades every aspect within the animated cartoon medium. This 'queerness' might not consistently pertain strictly to sexuality, yet it undoubtedly relates to nearly all facets, explaining its inherent susceptibility to appropriation by the queer community. For an extended period, the concept of 'mutant' has served as Marvel's analogue to 'queer,' a connection profoundly embraced by the LGBT community.