How Do Gay Individuals Ascertain Who Takes the Bottom Role?

Heterosexual individuals often become rather fixated on designations and functions within queer relationships. Regarding homosexual sex, numerous individuals seem to approach it rigidly and somewhat too heteronormatively, which isn't beneficial: one individual assumes the role of the top (also known as the giver or the more dominant participant during sexual activity), while the other is the bottom (the recipient or the more submissive participant).

It is somewhat akin to a more inquisitive variant of the other exceptionally simplistic and notably troublesome inquiry that queer individuals consistently encounter: "Within the context of the relationship, who embodies the masculine role? Who embodies the feminine role?"

Certainly, akin to virtually anything associated with sexual activity, the binary dynamic between tops and bottoms exhibits considerably greater intricacy than initially perceived. Without a doubt, there exists a multitude of queer individuals who predominantly engage in either bottoming or topping during sexual encounters; however, an equivalent number identify as versatile or switch (and incidentally, occasionally, analogous to heterosexual sex, penetration is entirely absent. Sexuality possesses fluidity!).

To explore this topic further, queer men were consulted regarding topping and bottoming, the stereotypes linked to both, and their decision-making process regarding utilizing (or refraining from utilizing) these terms in their individual experiences.

While each individual maintains uniqueness, tops (or dominant partners) generally exhibit a preference for penetrating and/or assuming control within the bedroom setting. A bottom (or submissive partner) typically assumes the role of the receptive partner during penetrative intercourse or the individual relinquishing control.

According to Joe Kort, a sex and relationship therapist specializing in work with LGBTQ+ clients, 'The responsibilities of the bottom involve articulating preferred methods of penetration and desired degrees of control. Furthermore, the bottom ensures adequate preparation and cleansing before sexual activity - a personal annoyance I harbor regarding the depiction of LGBTQ+ individuals in non-pornographic films stems from their portrayal of anal sex as effortless, which it is not!'

Preparing oneself for anal sex might encompass douching, which entails the utilization of water alongside an enema or syringe with the intention of flushing the rectal cavity prior to engaging in the act. (Nonetheless, douching is not essential to ensure a gratifying experience during anal sex, and certain medical professionals even advise against the practice.)

Furthermore, the existence of power bottoms must be acknowledged: A power bottom challenges conventional 'top-bottom' dynamics via exerting influence over the forward movement and cadence while positioned beneath or anterior to their sexual partner. Envision it as an act of topping enacted from the bottom.

Should you possess an inclination towards both bottoming and topping, you would likely be classified as versatile or switch. Conversely, if you lack interest in penetration, you might self-identify as a 'side,' denoting an individual who refrains from engaging in anal intercourse but remains amenable to alternative activities (such as oral sex, rimming, or mutual masturbation).

Males who engage in sexual activity with males yet do not consistently partake in penetration are, realistically, fairly prevalent. In the context of a study concerning men that engage in sex with men that was documented within the Journal of Sexual Medicine throughout two thousand and eleven, in excess of sixty percent of those that participated had not been engaging throughout anal intercourse throughout their most recent sexual event.

While this expansive range of terminology could potentially facilitate the process of discovering prospective partners through dating and hookup apps for some, the pronounced emphasis placed on labeling or categorization constitutes a dilemma for numerous individuals within the queer demographic.

According to Davey Wavey, a content creator and YouTuber who is also affiliated with the adult film platform himeros.tv, 'I consistently flinch when presented with labels for tops and bottoms. Since we are gay individuals, we already navigate a rather restricted pool of potential partners. To subsequently narrow this pool to exclusively encompass tops or exclusively encompass bottoms ultimately disserves the individual. Affixing labels to our identities contingent upon sexual preferences feels inherently restrictive.'

Although top-bottom terminology finds the majority of its association with gay men, queer females additionally employ said expressions. (Nevertheless, findings extracted from a survey performed by queer website Autostraddle have signified most queer females elect to consider themselves switches as opposed to tops or bottoms.)

Specifically, how should one interpret the performance of topping in relation to queer female identity? Such acts will potentially encompass, among several other instances of fun sexual activities, manual stimulation, oral stimulation, plus the engagement in utilization related to a strap-on for means of penetration.

In more instances than not, individuals are generally equipped with the wherewithal required in order to decide whether one would much more so consider identifying in relation to the status being that of a bottom, top, alternatively switch through contemplation regarding the origin of one's sense that they exist in relation to being turned upon within a generalized perspective.

According to Kort, 'My clientele have informed me they have gained better understandings of respective roles that are either those being that of a top or alternatively those in relation to the bottom by using thought in connection to elements they would fantasize being involved throughout practices in masturbation and also by getting involved within both in order to observe how interactions would be best oriented in connection to what resulted most in connection to rousing their respective persons.'

Of course, contingent on specific situations in conjunction with the overall degree of interpersonal chemistry experienced alongside any given partner, there is certainly leeway for engagement from the perspective of a switch.

Due to our immersion within a patriarchal societal framework that holds masculinity in particularly high esteem, it stands to logical reasoning bottoms may perhaps bear the brunt end from feelings of being put to shame for engaging in practices closely coinciding with which females tend to be expected to go about doing throughout sex. Topping is appreciated more in relation to some men who are known for engaging in sex with men because such actions don't pose a threat to male identity.

Madison Moore, a cultural critic and queer studies professor, observed in a 2014 post on Thought Catalog that "The issue stems from tops being almost consistently represented as men who are more manly, virile, and aggressively postured, but conversely, bottoms are typically connected with a tendency towards effeminacy considering the common understanding of their orientation that makes them viewed as holding the position of being more submissive".

In Moore's own words, "This attitude is wholly a product of our culture deeply connected to our perspective in connection to the manner in which we tend to approach concepts in connection to gender. Namely, that men should embody traits closely linked to masculine behavior. Also, that men aren't expected to participate with others who insert dicks up the anus."

The topic speaks to one of a larger scale, one where discrimination commonly affects males who outwardly portray many feminine traits as they participate within gay culture.

Avoid drawing assumptions related to any particular person's preference in connection to any kind of sexual position mainly oriented in relation to that said individual's manner for which they present their overall selves.

There exists a plentiful collection of males in appreciation of bottoming. (Also, that there is a surplus amongst persons who take an assertive posture while they operate at work or take part amongst public life and furthermore take pleasure from utilizing the overall availability to relinquish some amongst the control that they carry over within the confines of the bedroom just before acting out the position of a submissive). Femme gay males exist in substantial quantities who very much enjoy topping.

Bradley Birkholz, a YouTube creator and gay rights activist, claims "Putting a person inside of a box on the basis of how they express their inner person or what physique they may possess can be said as absolute nonsense, not actually to mention the fact that one might also perceive such treatment is being degrading."

When one makes the assumption that a specific act or element will take place on your person while in bed, it will lead to consequences as one attempts to act it out irregardless to sexuality or gender, as Birkholz claims. Birkholz claims that one component that contributes to cultures of present day society tells persons overall means by which to speak, act, or dress imply a desire towards particular expectations once acting out practices from the bedroom, but that there stands as simply and undoubtedly an inaccurate assumption in this circumstance.

Communication stands as holding the key to unlocking all that can be experienced as part of any particular sexual encounter. What you are responsible to perform will exist as making the request in order to ultimately identify which elements your partner takes pleasure in instead of merely drawing assumptions.

20 Years OfFreeJournalism

Your Support Fuels Our Mission

Your Support Fuels Our Mission

Birkholz indicates that gay persons can absolutely remain uninterested in anal sex, and that the use that occurs for bottom and top labeled positions exists with no inherent problem; it remains inappropriate to attempt assigning these markers regarding the overall attributes for any other person simply by relying upon baseless presumptions.

Sex Ed for Grown-Ups is a series tackling everything you didn't learn about sex in school — beyond the birds and the bees. Keep checking back for more expert-based articles and personal stories.

Advertisement